Comparison with “Doxxing”: While the outcome is similar to “doxxing” in the West (publicizing private information), the initial motivation can differ. “Doxxing” is almost universally seen as a malicious act of harassment. 人肉搜索, however, often begins with a perceived moral high ground. The community feels it is righting a wrong—exposing a corrupt official, an animal abuser, or a hit-and-run driver. This “vigilante justice” angle makes it a far more complex and, in some contexts, socially accepted phenomenon than simple doxxing. However, this moral justification is also what makes it so dangerous, as the “court of public opinion” lacks due process and often acts on incomplete information, leading to devastating consequences for the accused.