The term 国父 (guófù) is deeply tied to the birth of modern China. Sun Yat-sen is a unique historical figure because he is revered by both the Kuomintang (KMT), which governs Taiwan (the Republic of China, or ROC), and the Communist Party of China (CPC), which governs mainland China (the People's Republic of China, or PRC).
In Taiwan (ROC), 国父 (Guófù) is the official, legally mandated title for Sun Yat-sen. His portrait hangs in government buildings and schools, and he is honored on national holidays. He is seen as the direct founder of their state.
In mainland China (PRC), while the term 国父 is widely understood and used respectfully in historical contexts, his official title is more often “革命的先行者” (gémìng de xiānxíngzhě), meaning “Forerunner of the Revolution.” This acknowledges his crucial role in ending the old system, which paved the way for the later Communist revolution led by Mao Zedong.
This dual reverence makes him a rare unifying figure in cross-strait relations.
Comparison to Western Culture: The closest Western concept is “Founding Father.” However, there's a key difference. The United States has a collective of “Founding Fathers” (Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, etc.). In contrast, 国父 is a singular title. This reflects a cultural tendency to centralize a founding narrative around a single, preeminent figure, embodying the spirit of the new nation in one person.
国父 (guófù) is not a word used in everyday casual conversation. Its use is almost exclusively confined to formal, historical, or political contexts.
Historical and Academic Discussions: When discussing the Xinhai Revolution, the founding of the Republic of China, or 20th-century Chinese politics, this term is standard and appropriate.
Formal Media and Government: In Taiwan, news reports, political speeches, and official documents frequently use 国父. In mainland China, you will see it in documentaries, museums (like the Sun Yat-sen Mausoleum in Nanjing), and history books.
Connotation and Formality: The term is always used with deep respect. It is highly formal and carries significant historical weight. Using it flippantly would be considered inappropriate.